Saturday, October 18, 2025
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
No Result
View All Result

A trade deal without teeth isn’t worth the paper it is printed on: Ed Fast in the National Review

USMCA’s success cannot hinge on political mood swings.

October 17, 2025
in Economy and Trade, Uncategorized
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A

This article originally appeared in the National Review. Below is an excerpt from the article. 

By Ed Fast, October 17, 2025

When Canada, the United States, and Mexico signed USMCA, their new free trade agreement, in 2018, it was supposed to lock in a generation of trade stability. The agreement modernized NAFTA for a digital era, expanded market access, and renewed North America’s commitment to open and rules-based commerce. Six years later, the deal’s durability is already in question.

The problem isn’t that trade volumes have fallen — they’ve grown. The problem is enforceability. When one partner disregards the spirit and letter of the deal without consequence, the entire North American trade framework collapses. The 2026 USMCA review must deliver ironclad enforcement provisions that make the rules stick.

At the heart of the coming 2026 review — or renegotiation, as it is fast becoming — must be a serious conversation about how to ensure the rules are respected. An agreement that can be violated or ignored with impunity is no agreement at all.

The Trump administration’s renewed use of Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act — claiming “national security” to justify punitive tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum, and, more recently, copper — reveals the core weakness of the current deal. These tariffs are not about national security. They are protectionism dressed up as patriotism.

Canada is the United States’ closest ally, an integrated defense partner, and a supplier of critical materials that underpin North American security itself. To suggest that Canadian metals threaten U.S. security is as illogical as claiming that oxygen threatens life. Yet Washington has repeatedly used Section 232 as a cudgel to extract concessions or to appease domestic lobbies, knowing that the trade remedies within USMCA are too slow, too narrow, and too political to deter bad behavior.

Continue reading…


Ed Fast, distinguished fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and the Center for North American Prosperity and Security, is a former Minister of International Trade who led Canada’s negotiations on CETA, the TPP, and the Canada–Korea Free Trade Agreement.

Source: National Review
Previous Post

With no trade progress, Carney’s meeting with Trump looked like ‘mutual back-scratching’: Brian Lee Crowley in the National Post

Related Posts

Understanding the Future of North American Trade and Security
Events

Understanding the Future of North American Trade and Security

October 10, 2025
Media

(Dis)empowering Africa: How the West’s energy policies fuel poverty in the continent

September 15, 2025
Economy and Trade

Navigating tariff turbulence – A strategic assessment of Canadian and Indian responses to US trade pressure: Stephen Nagy in WGI.World

August 26, 2025
Center for North American Prosperity and Security

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) is a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization in the US and a registered charity in Canada. CNAPS is a division of MLI.

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Contact

The Center for North American Prosperity and Security is a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s leading public policy think tank.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Contact

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.