Sunday, June 1, 2025
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
No Result
View All Result

Trump’s tariffs could cost 600,000 Canadian jobs: Trevor Tombe in The Hub

While the tariffs aren’t a direct tax on Canadians, the effects will be felt through reduced demand for our goods.

February 3, 2025
in Economy and Trade
Reading Time: 3 mins read
A A
Trump’s tariffs could cost 600,000 Canadian jobs: Trevor Tombe in The Hub

This article originally appeared in The Hub.

By Trevor Tombe, February 3, 2025

We’re in it now. The U.S. has now launched what the Wall Street Journal has (accurately) called the “dumbest trade war in history.” This move will impose new taxes on American consumers and businesses purchasing goods from Canada and Mexico, while increasing existing tariffs on Chinese imports.

For Canada, the impact is severe: a 25 percent tariff on all goods and a 10 percent tariff on energy. Together, these cover roughly 80 percent of the $600 billion in exports we send to the U.S. each year.

While these tariffs aren’t a direct tax on Canadians, the effects will be felt through reduced demand for our goods. Although we’ll get a clearer picture in the coming days, some quick calculations reveal just how significant the economic hit could be.

If U.S. demand drops in proportion to the tariff (a simple illustration), I estimate it will translate to a $160 billion blow to Canada’s economy—$100 billion in direct losses and another $60 billion in upstream effects.

Graphic credit: Janice Nelson.

The pain varies a lot across sectors. Vehicle manufacturing could see demand fall by more than 15 percent, with some subsectors approaching a staggering 25 percent decline. And this likely underestimates (potentially by a lot) the broader disruption to supply chains that crisscross the border.

Other manufacturing industries would face an average demand drop of about 10 percent, while the resource and agriculture sectors would see declines of around 8 percent. Even industries not directly targeted by tariffs, like services, would take a hit. And while the impact on services may seem modest, this sector makes up the bulk of Canada’s economy.

If these output losses translate proportionally to employment, Canada could see roughly 600,000 fewer jobs, potentially pushing the unemployment rate up to nearly 10 percent. While a rough estimate and losses would take quite a bit of time to materialize (on the order of several months or the better part of a year) these figures align with more detailed analyses, including recent work by Scotiabank economists, who also project a three-percentage-point rise in unemployment.

Regionally, I use detailed census data to estimate where the economic and employment hit might be greatest. While all parts of Canada are exposed, the hardest-hit areas would be southeastern Quebec and southern Ontario, where manufacturing is most concentrated.

Graphic credit: Janice Nelson.

In response, Canada is hitting back with its own tariffs—starting at 25 percent on $30 billion in U.S. goods and expanding to $155 billion in just three weeks. That covers about one-third of what we import from the U.S. While some specifics are still unclear, this appears to be the most extensive retaliation the government could impose without targeting inputs essential to our own industries.

Make no mistake—this is still a tax increase on Canadians, one that will further slow our economy. But by stopping short of a strict dollar-for-dollar escalation, policymakers have at least avoided inflicting even greater damage on Canadian businesses and consumers. Let’s now hope that economic pain on both sides of the border forces a rethink by the U.S. administration before the damage becomes permanent.


Trevor Tombe is a professor of economics at the University of Calgary, a research fellow at The School of Public Policy, and a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

Source: The Hub

This material is distributed by CNAPS on behalf of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

Previous Post

US-Canada defense and security cooperation in the Trump era: Balkan Devlen, Jamie Tronnes, Richard Shimooka, and Alexander Lanoszka for Inside Policy Talks

Next Post

We Have a Tariff Reprieve. Let’s Use it to Firmly Establish the Facts: Tim Sargent and Fen Osler Hampson for Policy Magazine

Related Posts

Economy and Trade

Hard truths about trade and migration from a Texas diner: Laura Dawson in The Hub

May 20, 2025
How Did Trump Impact the Canadian Election? Brian Lee Crowley on American Thought Leaders
National Security and Defense

How Did Trump Impact the Canadian Election? Brian Lee Crowley on American Thought Leaders

May 16, 2025
The future of U.S.-Canada minerals cooperation: Heather Exner-Pirot on CSIS Americas
Economy and Trade

The future of U.S.-Canada minerals cooperation: Heather Exner-Pirot on CSIS Americas

May 14, 2025
Next Post
We Have a Tariff Reprieve. Let’s Use it to Firmly Establish the Facts: Tim Sargent and Fen Osler Hampson for Policy Magazine

We Have a Tariff Reprieve. Let’s Use it to Firmly Establish the Facts: Tim Sargent and Fen Osler Hampson for Policy Magazine

Center for North American Prosperity and Security

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) is a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization in the US and a registered charity in Canada. CNAPS is a division of MLI.

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Contact

The Center for North American Prosperity and Security is a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s leading public policy think tank.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Contact

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.