Thursday, April 16, 2026
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
No Result
View All Result

Canada’s Anti-American Defense Industrial Strategy: Daniel Dorman and Jamie Tronnes in the National Review

Canada’s DIS is too protectionist, contains too much anti-American political rhetoric, and is not enough about actual defense.

April 16, 2026
in Latest News, National Security and Defense
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
Canada’s Anti-American Defense Industrial Strategy: Daniel Dorman and Jamie Tronnes in the National Review

This article originally appeared in National Review. An excerpt of the article appears below.

By Daniel Dorman and Jamie Tronnes, April 16, 2026

There is something unprincipled and backward about Canada’s new Defense Industrial Strategy (DIS). Namely, its protectionism and not-so-subtle anti-Americanism.

As highlighted in Prime Minister Mark Carney’s press release, a core tenet of the strategy is to “raise the share of defense acquisitions awarded to Canadian firms to 70%” or, as Carney said elsewhere, to significantly reduce “dependency” on the U.S.

This buy-Canadian defense industrial strategy fails in two distinct ways. First, it takes advantage of the U.S. at a time of already strained relations and a forthcoming review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. And second, as our colleague at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute Richard Shimooka explains, it is backward. Instead of starting by defining Canada’s defense needs (the actual requirements of Canada’s military and the capabilities needed to support our allies) and then building an industrial strategy to meet those needs, Canada started with an industrial strategy apparently designed to extract economic benefit from defense investment and which largely fails to consider the actual military needs of the Canadian Armed Forces.

In fairness, the DIS states, “Canada has a long history of working closely with the United States and looks forward to a continued strong Canada-U.S. defence relationship” but this strikes us as lip service — a half-hearted reassurance for American readers — against the broader messaging of “reducing reliance” on the U.S. that Carney highlighted as the strategy was released, and against the actual substance of the policy that Canada “will focus first on building in Canada.”

***TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE, VISIT NATIONAL REVIEW HERE***


Daniel Dorman is the managing editor and director of operations at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa.

Jamie Tronnes is the executive director of the Center for North American Prosperity and Security in Washington, D.C.

Source: National Review
Previous Post

Canada’s dangerous obsession with Donald Trump: Stephen Nagy in the National Review

Related Posts

Economy and Trade

An Ally’s Guide to Understanding Trump: Brian Lee Crowley in the Wall Street Journal

March 21, 2026
Latest News

Beyond tobacco – The new frontier of illicit nicotine products in Canada

March 12, 2026
Trump and Netanyahu have the law, and the facts, on their side: Brian Cox in Real Clear World
Media

Trump and Netanyahu have the law, and the facts, on their side: Brian Cox in Real Clear World

March 5, 2026
Center for North American Prosperity and Security

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) is a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization in the US and a registered charity in Canada. CNAPS is a division of MLI.

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate

The Center for North American Prosperity and Security is a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s leading public policy think tank.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.