Friday, July 24, 2026
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate
No Result
View All Result
CNAPS.org
No Result
View All Result

Cutting off oil exports to spite Trump would cripple Canada: Heather Exner-Pirot in the National Post

Resources should be used as carrots, not sticks.

July 24, 2026
in Economy and Trade, Latest News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Cutting off oil exports to spite Trump would cripple Canada: Heather Exner-Pirot in the National Post

Official White House photo by Daniel Torok, via Flickr.

This article originally appeared in the National Post.

By Heather Exner-Pirot, July 24, 2026

Doug Ford is mad, and he has every right to be. While his province suffered from wildfires and evacuations, a lineup of American politicians chose to criticize and politicize Ontario’s response, rather than offer to help. To add insult to injury, U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a new set of unjustifiable tariffs on Monday that disproportionately harm Ontario’s economy.

In response, at the Council of the Federation this week, the gathering of premiers and the Prime Minister in Charlottetown, Ford implied we should leverage our oil and potash to “dismantle” the U.S. and make them “feel the pain.”

While an emotional reaction is understandable, weaponizing our resources in a trade war undermines our broader national interests. Canada’s highest and best purpose in the international system is not to use our energy and minerals for coercion; it is to constrain that kind of predatory behaviour from others.

First, the practical details. Canada is indeed a massive exporter of oil to the United States, about four million barrels a day. No country in the world imports more oil from another than they do from us, and many American refineries require our kind of heavy oil.

But more than vulnerability, this has created an interdependence. They must buy from us because we must sell to them, and we are irrevocably tied across the continent through a system of pipelines developed over decades. Canada could theoretically cut off oil and gas supplies to the U.S.A., but in practice it would mean we could no longer sell our most valuable export, and would fall into recession, and much of eastern Canada would be cut off as well. This mutually assured destruction is why energy exports have not been ensnared by tariffs in the first place.

It is not only Canada and the United States that would be harmed. Disrupting this essential energy trade at a time when the world is staring down the barrel of three concurrent oil crises — Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, Houthis and the Bab-el-Mandab Strait, and Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries — would tip an incredibly precarious situation into a full-blown crisis, with devastating economic impacts around the globe.

There are also longer-term effects to consider. We are in a geopolitical era where economic coercion is rampant, and energy and critical minerals are being manipulated and weaponized for short term political gain. Export restrictions, blockades, tariffs, sanctions, and confiscations have become commonplace.

Perhaps there is a temptation to play these same games, but it is not one Canada is culturally or institutionally suited for. Rather, Canada has an enormous opportunity to leverage its reputation as a trustworthy and reliable exporter of energy and resources to diversify its trading partners and grow its global market share. Supply chain security has real economic value today and will over the course of this decades-long commodity cycle. Ford’s threats, empty though they may be, introduce the possibility that Canada may withhold its resources for political ends. This is a damaging message to send and should go no further.

Finally, there is no comparison between pulling whiskey off of liquor store shelves, and cutting off oil supplies in the midst of an energy crisis. One is a protest; the other falls just short of an act of war. Canada is far more popular than Trump in the United States, holding an 80 per cent favourability rating, while Trump’s approval rating is now down to 36 per cent. This is a material advantage in trade negotiations. It would be squandered if we exacerbated Americans’ energy costs and pushed them into shortages.

Fighting fire with fire may be emotionally appealing, but it will end with Canada getting burned. We have a far better option: diversifying our trading partners. It happens to be a seller’s market for Canada’s energy and minerals, and with recent announcements for ports and pipelines, we are making strides towards getting more product to new markets. Let’s direct our energy towards that.

No one will convince me that China, Russia, Iran and the U.S. are better off because of their economically coercive tactics. In fact the entire world is suffering due to the collective pivot away from free trade and a rules-based order.

While recognizing the short term harms many Canadian families are feeling, I sincerely believe these conditions present an opportunity for Canada. Our energy and critical minerals are not our greatest competitive advantage right now; our trustworthiness is. Let us prove that success comes not from spiting adversaries but from making new friends.


Heather Exner-Pirot is the director of energy, natural resources, and the environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

Source: National Post
Previous Post

Canada’s energy strategy: Jamie Tronnes on the Energy Security Cubed Podcast

Related Posts

Canada’s energy strategy: Jamie Tronnes on the Energy Security Cubed Podcast
Energy and Environment

Canada’s energy strategy: Jamie Tronnes on the Energy Security Cubed Podcast

July 22, 2026
Playing defence didn’t protect Canada from Trump’s latest tariffs. It’s time to move into the offensive zone: Fen Osler Hampson and Tim Sargent in The Globe and Mail
Economy and Trade

Playing defence didn’t protect Canada from Trump’s latest tariffs. It’s time to move into the offensive zone: Fen Osler Hampson and Tim Sargent in The Globe and Mail

July 22, 2026
Chinese EVs are high-risk lightning rods in a metal box. Do we really want them?: Daniel Dorman in The Globe and Mail
Economy and Trade

Chinese EVs are high-risk lightning rods in a metal box. Do we really want them?: Daniel Dorman in The Globe and Mail

July 21, 2026
Center for North American Prosperity and Security

The Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) is a non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization in the US and a registered charity in Canada. CNAPS is a division of MLI.

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • About
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate

The Center for North American Prosperity and Security is a project of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Canada’s leading public policy think tank.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
    • Why CNAPS ?
    • Advisory Council
    • Our Impact
  • Our Work
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Donate

© 2023 CNAPS. All rights reserved.